Church Culture and Passive Faith
In the last two decades or so, the Body of Christ has seen the rise of what’s been called the “seeker-sensitive” movement. From news reports, Willow Creek Community Church in Chicago has been the primary mover-and-shaker in the movement. While “seeker-sensitive” cannot be rigidly defined, it is characterized by its emphasis on church growth with demographic studies, marketing research, and sermons consistent with “felt” needs. Many of the larger churches employing the move have instituted various kinds of programs linked to “need” or “interest” demographics, such as single parent groups, divorced groups, hunting groups, women’s groups, young women’s groups, business and professional groups, etc. (you get the picture).
Recently, Willow Creek released its findings of a multi-year study on the effectiveness of its programs and its “seeker-sensitive” thrust of ministry. Commenting on the study’s conclusion, Bill Hybels, the pastor of Willow Creek, said this:
We made a mistake. What we should have done when people crossed the line of faith and become Christians, we should have started telling people and teaching people that they have to take responsibility to become ‘self feeders.’ We should have gotten people, taught people, how to read their bible between services, how to do the spiritual practices much more aggressively on their own. (See Bob Burney, Shocking “Confession” from Willow Creek Community Church)
While many critics of the “seeker-sensitive” movement have reveled in Hybels’s comment, we believe that their high-fives might be more of the kettles calling the pot black. Hybel’s inculcation of a passive Christian faith really isn’t too different from most of the rest of the Christian spectrum. What is so different from a mega-church employing a hundred or more passive programs for their attendees and a small church where the pastor preaches 100% of the time and there is never a moment given for testimonies or any “psalms, hymns, or spiritual songs?” In our mind, nothing much if anything at all.
Do not, then, cast away your freedom of speech, - The which hath a great recompense. For of endurance ye have need, In order that the will of God having done, Ye may bear away the promise. (Hebrews 10.35, 36 Rotherham)
One of the strengths of the early Pentecostal movement was not just the fact that people were baptized in the Holy Ghost, but its “testimony meetin’s.” Ordinary Christians, you know, those without formal seminary degrees and long “C.V.s,” would be called upon to publicly declare what things the Lord had done for them, whether it be a recent healing or just the fact that they had been saved for so many years. The testimonies brought a vibrancy not only to those who testified, but to everyone in the church.
In a first for our own local church, at a recent service the pastor called a man up to the platform and explained that the man wanted to make a confession. When the man took the mike (you could tell that he was not a public speaker in any form or fashion), he haltingly explained that he had been born-again seven months earlier, but had never made a public confession about it to anyone. He said that he (and the Lord) knew that he needed to and so he asked the pastor if he could do so after a sermon. That man’s testimony not only blessed the congregation (and the man), but it thoroughly munched the pastor’s razzmatazz sermon.
The seeker-sensitive movement isn’t the only camp in the Body of Christ that has failed to appreciate the importance of do-it-yourself “spiritual practices.” In recent years, Full Gospel churches have paid homage to the American-style seeker-sensitive church growth scheme. They would do well to revisit their spiritual roots, ditch the crass professionalism, and re-establish the old Pentecostal tradition of public testimonies (among other things).
Your last sentence is so powerful that I took the liberty to copy and paste it here with one minor change.
“They(We) would do well to revisit their(our) spiritual roots, ditch the crass professionalism, and re-establish the old Pentecostal tradition of public testimonies (among other things).
As I see it our “spiritual roots” was a deep desire to have the fullness of the Holy Spirit just like it was in the book of Acts. The “seeker sensitive” person of the early days of Pentecostalism was focused on seeking God and being sensitive to His Spirit even if it meant forsaking everything else. Early Pentecostals wanted the reality of the Book of Acts so much they did not care if it offended anyone. Being criticized for what they believed or how they acted was of no concern. They just wanted to be sensitive to the moving of the Holy Spirit.
I believe that people are beginning to realize there must be more to serving God than a cute weekly(or is it weakly) sermon. They are hungry for more and when people get hungry for God guess what happens.
Larry, thanks for the comment and I like your edit (wish I had originally written it that way).
You crack me up with your comments:
“…we believe that their high-fives might be more of the kettles calling the pot black.”
and
“…but it thoroughly munched the pastor’s razzmatazz sermon.”
Well struck. Very well struck.
When a pastor makes church growth the prime and the ultimate aim of ministry, anything that doesn’t have direct impact on attracting seats to the seats is doomed to the same fate as the rotary phone. Lay participation in the service, like testimonies and spiritual gifts, may be edifying to the saints but aren’t seen as attractive to the less than saints. Can we do ought but err when we take as under our purview that which belongs to God alone: one plants, another waters, but God makes it grow?
slw, the irony is that if the Gospel is preached and the Spirit is indeed moving, the church will grow. It takes more of a little wild fire than Harvard marketing principles, however.
The Gospels and the Acts of the Apostles records many instances of how miracles had a great impact on the unbeliever, so much that many became followers of Jesus.
And whatever happened to “tongues being a sign to the unbeliever?”
(I Cor. 14.22)
What a bill of goods someone sold the modern day church…to think that we could substitute God’s ways for our ways.
AmeriKan,
Thanks for the comment. Ironically, tongues is on our podcast menu (a little way down the road).